Corwinn vs Service Fusion
Your technician loses signal in the basement. Then what?
Service Fusion's mobile app needs an active connection for every function — no offline mode at all. On Android, where most field technicians actually are, that shows up directly in the app's own store rating.
Not accredited. 6 complaints filed; 5 of 6 received no company response, which is what drives the F.
Source: BBB ↗800+ reviews. Reported issues: crashes during job updates, lost data, photo upload failures on anything less than strong LTE, battery drain.
Source: Google Play ↗Same product, 1,200+ reviews, dramatically different experience — a sign the gap is real, not a general product problem.
Source: App Store listings, aggregated ↗What Service Fusion's own reviews say
Not our claims — recurring themes pulled directly from the public sources cited above.
Corwinn vs Service Fusion
| Service Fusion | Corwinn | |
|---|---|---|
| Offline field access | None — confirmed, every function needs a live connection | Full read + write + create offline, this is the core architecture, not a bolt-on |
| Android experience | 2.7/5, 800+ reviews — crashes, lost data, failed photo uploads | Built and tested primarily on Android from day one |
| Job costing / reporting | Not a named strength in any review source checked | Per-job revenue, parts cost, and commission cost, built in |
| Pricing | $245/mo minimum, no free trial; add-ons reported to inflate bills 20-30% | Flat $99/mo base + $29/mo per technician, stated in full |
| Support responsiveness | "Practically zero response" is a repeated review theme | Direct support, no chatbot gate |
Flat pricing, stated in full
$99/mo
Unlimited owner, dispatcher, and office seats — plus $29/mo per active technician.
No add-on tiers. No 12-month contract. Month-to-month.
Start free