Corwinn vs Jobber
Jobber works fine at 5 technicians. Most shops outgrow it by 15.
Jobber's own reviews are genuinely decent on day-to-day usability — the real ceiling shows up in reporting depth and per-seat pricing once a shop scales past its sweet spot, and in a cluster of BBB billing/refund disputes worth knowing about going in.
9 of 9 published customer reviews are 1-star; 5 of 9 never received a company response.
Source: BBB ↗227 reviews — 71% five-star, 18% one-star. Solid on the whole; the 1-star minority is where the pattern below lives.
Source: Trustpilot ↗Reviewers consistently cite this as the point custom-reporting and job-costing gaps start to bite.
Source: Aggregated review analysis ↗What Jobber's own reviews say
Not our claims — recurring themes pulled directly from the public sources cited above.
Corwinn vs Jobber
| Jobber | Corwinn | |
|---|---|---|
| Offline field access | Limited — mobile app degrades without signal | Full read + write + create offline, syncs when back online |
| Job costing | No built-in revenue-vs-cost-per-job report | Per-job revenue, parts cost, and commission cost, built in |
| Custom reporting | Reviewers repeatedly cite this as missing | Reports are live queries against your real data, not a fixed template |
| Pricing | Per-user, cited as rising and punishing growth past ~8 seats | Flat $99/mo base (unlimited office seats) + $29/mo per technician |
| Contract | Billing/refund disputes are the top BBB complaint theme | Month-to-month, no lock-in contract |
Flat pricing, stated in full
$99/mo
Unlimited owner, dispatcher, and office seats — plus $29/mo per active technician.
No add-on tiers. No 12-month contract. Month-to-month.
Start free